Caimbrie
05-20-2008, 01:24 PM
Senator Ted Kennedy was diagnosed with brain cancer. Very sad.
|
View Full Version : How Sad Caimbrie 05-20-2008, 01:24 PM Senator Ted Kennedy was diagnosed with brain cancer. Very sad. MelissaMc424 05-20-2008, 01:26 PM That is sad.. did they say how long he has? Caimbrie 05-20-2008, 01:28 PM That is sad.. did they say how long he has? It was breaking news, interrupted my AMC :lol They said they were going to start aggressive treatment right away. They spoke to a doctor who said that only 50% of people who get this type of aggressive brain cancer lives and those who die usually die within 18 months. I'll see if there is an article about it yet. Becca 05-20-2008, 01:29 PM That's very sad :no :sadeyes Caimbrie 05-20-2008, 01:30 PM This is all CNN has so far since it was just released. http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/20/kennedy.tumor/index.html (CNN) -- U.S. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy has a malignant brain tumor, doctors treating him at Massachusetts General Hospital said Tuesday. Kennedy was hospitalized Saturday morning after suffering a seizure at his family's compound at Hyannis Port, Massachusetts. "Preliminary results from a biopsy of the brain identified the cause of the seizure as a malignant glioma in the left parietal lobe," according to a statement from the doctors treating the senator. "The usual course of treatment includes combinations of various forms of radiation and chemotherapy," they said. MelissaMc424 05-20-2008, 01:30 PM It was breaking news, interrupted my AMC :lol They said they were going to start aggressive treatment right away. They spoke to a doctor who said that only 50% of people who get this type of aggressive brain cancer lives and those who die usually die within 18 months. I'll see if there is an article about it yet. wow.. ash 05-20-2008, 01:32 PM i love the kennedys. He is my favorite current politician and this just makes me really sad :( Caimbrie 05-20-2008, 01:33 PM http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/treatment/brain/malignantglioma Key words Brain tumor, malignant glioma, surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy Summary Many patients diagnosed with malignant gliomas (http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary/db_alpha.aspx?expand=g#glioma) between 1997 and 2000 received treatment that did not conform with established practice guidelines for the care of adults with this type of brain tumor, according to a new study. Source Journal of the American Medical Association, February 2, 2005 (see the journal abstract (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15687310)). Background Malignant gliomas are the most common primary (http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary/db_alpha.aspx?expand=p#primary tumor) brain tumor, accounting for more than half of the more than 18,000 primary malignant brain tumors diagnosed each year in the United States. These tumors are the second-most common cause of cancer death in the 15 to 44 age group. The outlook for patients with malignant gliomas is poor. Median survival (http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary/db_alpha.aspx?expand=m#Median survival time) for patients with moderately severe (grade III) malignant gliomas is three to five years. For patients with the most severe, aggressive form of malignant glioma (grade IV glioma or glioblastoma multiforme (http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary/db_alpha.aspx?expand=g#glioblastoma multiforme)), median survival is less than a year. Surgery is recommended for all operable brain tumors and is usually followed by radiation therapy. Several studies have shown that adding chemotherapy to radiation can improve patients' survival. In June 2004, after the completion of the current study, researchers announced that adding the drug temozolomide (Temodar®) to radiation therapy increased median survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme by about two months (see related story (http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/results/glioblastoma0604)). This approach is now considered the standard of care for the initial treatment of these tumors. The Study The Glioma Outcomes Project is a study that tracked how patients with grade III or IV malignant gliomas were treated and what the outcomes of that treatment were. A total of 565 patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas were enrolled in the study between 1997 and 2000; 74 percent of these patients had grade IV gliomas. Patients were treated both at academic medical centers and by community oncologists (http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary/db_alpha.aspx?expand=o#oncologist). Information about their care and its outcomes was collected when patients enrolled, immediately after they had surgery, and at three-month intervals thereafter for two years or until the patient's death, whichever occurred sooner. The study's lead author is Susan M. Chang, M.D., of the University of California, San Francisco. Results The treatment patients received conformed with practice guidelines in some respects and departed from them in others. For example, most patients underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary/db_alpha.aspx?expand=m#magnetic resonance imaging) (MRI) at diagnosis. This imaging test is almost universally accepted as the test of choice for diagnosing malignant glioma. Also in keeping with practice guidelines, most patients had surgery to remove as much of the tumor as possible, followed by postoperative radiation therapy. However, only 54 percent received chemotherapy, despite the fact that chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival. Other aspects of patients' care conflicted with best practice recommendations. For example, the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) recommends treating glioma patients with anti-epileptic medications only if they have seizures as a symptom when their tumor is diagnosed. Because these drugs can have severe side effects, the AAN advises against prescribing them routinely to all patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas. Nevertheless, nearly 90 percent of patients in this study received anti-epileptic medications, although only 32 percent had seizures. Several areas of patients' care reflected a lack of agreement on best practice. For example, studies of the safety and effectiveness of giving low-dose anticoagulants (http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary/db_alpha.aspx?expand=a#anticoagulant) to prevent post-surgical blood clotting in glioma patients have produced conflicting findings. In this study, only 7 percent of patients received preventive anticoagulants, although as many as 60 percent developed blood clots within six weeks of surgery. Thirteen percent of newly diagnosed patients reported symptoms of depression. However, only 28.6 percent of these patients received antidepressant medications. Patients' doctors may have been concerned about the possible side effects of giving antidepressants to patients who were also taking anti-epileptic medications, the study authors say. The likelihood of such adverse effects is not known. Almost all patients received corticosteroid medications to reduce neurologic symptoms, although these medications may cause significant adverse effects such as diabetes, high blood pressure, muscle pain, and increased susceptibility to infections. Limitations This was an observational study, not a prospective clinical trial. (See Which Study Results Are the Most Helpful in Making Cancer Care Decisions? (http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/learning/goldstandard) for an explanation of how observational studies differ from clinical trials.) Patients in this study were diagnosed between 1997 and 2000, a time when there was little consensus about the best approach to treating newly diagnosed malignant gliomas, comments Howard Fine, M.D., Chief of the Neuro-Oncology Branch at the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Center for Cancer Research and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. That situation has changed, particularly since the release of the temozolomide findings in 2004, he says. Surgery plus radiation therapy plus temozolomide chemotherapy is now the established standard of care in the United States for all patients with newly diagnosed grade III or IV malignant gliomas. Comments "The data presented [in this study] suggest that current clinical practice does not follow guidelines or evidence," write Paul Graham Fisher, M.D., and Patrician A. Buffler, M.D., in an accompanying editorial. What's more, note the study's authors, "Variations in patterns of care were associated with differences in survival." Additional practice guidelines may help to reduce this variability, they suggest. Further research is needed to clarify the value of anticoagulants, antidepressants, and corticosteroids in the treatment of glioma patients, they add. To ensure that they receive care consistent with current best practices, patients with a diagnosis of malignant glioma should always obtain a second opinion from a brain tumor specialty center, advises Fine. NCI supports brain tumor specialty centers around the country; some centers specialize in treating adults while others specialize in treating children. Patients should also consider enrolling in a clinical trial, adds Fine. The Neuro-Oncology Branch (http://home.ccr.cancer.gov/nob/default.asp) offers free consultations and can provide information about NCI-directed and NCI-supported clinical trials around the country that are currently accepting patients. To obtain information about clinical trials or treatment for glioma patients, call NCI's Cancer Information Service at 1-800-4-CANCER (1-800-422-6237) or call the Neuro-Oncology Branch directly at 301-402-6298. Gillian_Angela 05-20-2008, 01:34 PM i love the kennedys. He is my favorite current politician and this just makes me really sad :( :agree Except my favorite currently politician is Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) eelo 05-20-2008, 02:05 PM Wow. MIKOSWIFEY 05-20-2008, 02:12 PM That's awful. :( Rebekah 05-20-2008, 02:18 PM how sad. :prayers for him. mrs_ski 05-20-2008, 02:21 PM :sadeyes He is a great guy. I hope everything gets better CocoaGoddess 05-20-2008, 02:28 PM The political world is at a complete standstill. Shows just how much he is admired and respected. flangl18 05-20-2008, 02:50 PM I don't like Kennedy at all - politically, but I will keep him in my prayers. It is a sad thing. A family friend of ours had this same and he passed within about 4 months after diagnosis. navywifeplus3 05-20-2008, 03:17 PM This breaks my heart to read this. I know the path this family will walk it is a quick and devistating path to walk. My Grandpa H. died of a glioblastoma multiforme brain tumor in 2004. He was diagnosed in June of 2003, had surgery to remove part of the tumor, 2 rounds of radiation and a round of chemo, but he passed away in March of 2004. I know the Kennedy's are rich and have been linked to some scandalous stuff, but they hurt just like the rest of us and God knows I wish they didn't have to know this kind of pain. My prayers will definitly be with them. Midge.T 05-20-2008, 03:20 PM The Kennedys certainly have had their share of heartache. It's terrible news. :( ilovekale 05-20-2008, 03:23 PM i saw him on the news yesterday and he just looks so frail. it's sad. Debra 05-20-2008, 03:25 PM Lots of prayers for him! Poor guy! :( LindsayLin 05-20-2008, 04:21 PM So sad. Navgirl 05-20-2008, 09:21 PM I never liked Ted Kennedy but I would never wish ill will on him and hopefully he will make it throgh this. Lauren 05-20-2008, 09:29 PM We were talking about this all day at work. I hope he recovers. I may not agree with all of his personal life, but I like a lot of the political things he's done. brentscrystal 05-20-2008, 10:07 PM While he isn't one of my favorite politicians, my prayers go out to him and his family. I have also seen what this can do to a man. It's completely awful. Astra 05-21-2008, 01:57 AM thats awful :( i really hope he recovers. tons of :pray for him and his family |