View Full Version : Is this ethical?


LittleMsSunshine
07-16-2008, 09:22 PM
I'm not usually one to have much sympathy for criminals.... but even I have a problem with this. :no

I-Team: Injection Used To Subdue Prisoners
Medical Expert Says Practice Is Troubling
Reported By Demetria Kalodimos

POSTED: 1:07 pm CDT July 10, 2008
UPDATED: 3:18 pm CDT July 13, 2008

NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- While the Metro police had banned the use of Tasers for a time, they still used a controversial method to subdue unruly people, according to an I-Team report.



The city's policy to use the method, which calls for the injection of a drug into a person, came as a "total surprise" to people most would expect to know all about it.

For almost two years, Metro police have had the option of calling for a needle loaded with a strong sedative to control the most unruly people they encounter on the street.

One of the doctors who came up with the protocol said it's the safest option out there and that it is used all over the country.

But many people said that the injection was news to them, and a top medical ethicist said it's a troubling precedent.

The drug is called Midazolam, which is better known as Versed. People who have had a colonoscopy have probably had a shot of the drug for the procedure.

"The drug has an amnesia effect, and we use that therapeutically because one of the nice ways to take care of the discomfort is to make people forget that they've had it," said biomedical ethics and law enforcement expert Dr. Steven Miles.

But the shots have also been used on the streets on people police said were out of control.

One of the first to get the shot administered to them was Dameon Beasley.

"Well, that night, I hadn't been properly taking my meds, you know, like I'm supposed to. I got so depressed that when I was up on the bridge running into traffic back and forth, cars dodging me, swerving, I ended up with two sharp objects in my hands. By that time, the police had arrived. I was charging them with these sharp objects trying to make them shoot me, actually yelling at them to shoot me," he said.

When a Taser didn't work on Beasley, police turned to a brand new protocol -- an injection of Versed. Officers called emergency medical personnel for the injection.

"I remember they were holding me down. There was maybe four or five on each side, and I remember they were calling for something, you know. Some guy came up on the left side and hit me with it," he said.

"I do know that whatever it was works immediately. I mean, you ain't got a chance if you are 300 pounds. It's like a horse tranquilizer. I don't care. You're gone. It's a wrap," he said.

Beasley said he had no idea what happened after he was injected.

"I woke up -- I don't know how much time had passed -- with a sergeant standing over me telling me to sign here. I didn't know what I was signing Ms. (Channel 4 I-Team reporter Demetria) Kalodimos. I just signed a piece of paper and was immediately right back out," he said.

Kalodimos reported that Beasley ended up at Metro General Hospital and was then put in psychiatric care. He was not charged in the incident on the bridge.

But Beasley's lawyer, a public defender, had no idea that Versed had been used to subdue him until Kalodimos told him about it.

Very few people seem to know about the almost 2-year-old policy, Kalodimos said.

The state's largest mental health advocacy group, Nashville's mental health judge, the Nashville Rescue Mission, the American Civil Liberties Union all said they had no knowledge of the use of the drug by police.

"I've talked to my colleagues around the country, and none of the people from the south to the north to the east to the west have ever heard about this kind of program, this kind of use where they basically force an injection upon an individual knowing nothing about his or her medical condition," said ACLU Director Hedy Weinberg.

"I can't tell you why those individuals don't know about it," said Dr. Corey Slovis, Nashville’s emergency medical director.

Along with medical examiner Dr. Bruce Levy, Slovis customized a Versed policy for Nashville that is endorsed by a group of emergency medical experts called the Eagles.

"It's something that in the medical community and in the EMS medical community is very common. It's a given. When I surveyed the major metropolitan areas around the country, I think only two cities were not actively using it," Slovis said.

Some have asked the question about potential problems.

Miles said he also had never heard of Versed being used in this way.

"There is no research guideline. There is no validated protocol for this. There's not even a clear set of indications for when this is to be used except when people are agitated. By saying that it's done by the emergency medical personnel, they basically are trying to have it both ways. That is, they’re trying to use a medical protocol that is not validated, not for a police function, arrest and detention," Miles said.

"The decision to administer Versed is based purely on a paramedic decision, not a police decision," Slovis said.

It's up to the officer to call an ambulance and determine if a person is in a condition called excited delirium.

"I don't know if I would use the word diagnosing, but they are assessing the situation and saying, 'This person is not acting rationally. This is something I've been trained to recognize, this seems like excited delirium.' I don't view delirium in the field as a police function. It is a medical emergency. We're giving the drug Versed that's routinely used in thousands of health care settings across the country in the field by trained paramedics. I view what we're doing as the best possible medical practice to a medical emergency," Slovis said.

Metro Government would not release the names of the eight other people who got Versed injections after police calls. A representative from Metro said that the information was protected in the way a medical record would be.

The representative said that only one person out of the nine had shown no improvement after the injection.

Versed was most recently used on a female in early June.

Three women of child bearing age have apparently gotten shots without consent, even though the package insert for Versed suggests that, "the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus."

"A single administration to calm a wildly delirious patient down even if she's pregnant is much safer to the woman and her unborn child than being allowed to be delirious, hypothermic, hyperventilating and perhaps hypoxic," Slovis said.

"I would think that with enough people being able to tackle the person to inject them, there should be another way to try to subdue someone without putting an injection in their vein," Weinberg said.

The biggest side effect that is seen in more than 80 percent of those who are injected with Versed is amnesia.

The side effect raises the question of a person being able to defend themselves in court if they can't remember what happened.

"If they would've said I'd done anything after that shot, hey, I couldn't have argued that fact. I don't remember," Beasley said.

Kalodimos reported that while doing research for this report, she found a post on a paramedics Internet chat site that said, "One good thing about Versed is that the patient won't remember how he got that footprint on his chest."

"We're very careful in Nashville," Slovis said. "Every instance of Versed use is reviewed by the both medical director, myself, our head of EMS quality assurance. We make sure that our paramedics treat patients right."

Miles said it would have been appropriate to put the idea of using Versed before what's called an Institutional Review Board for study to anticipate problems before they pop up.

"It may well be that a protocol could be designed to test the use of Versed in handling agitated persons at the time of detention. I'm not going to say that's not possible, but at any rate, you do it under a condition where you collect data rather than simply just going ahead and doing the drug and waiting to see if problems to develop," he said.

Miles added that, "Doing medicine by the seat of your pants is not the way to develop new therapies."

Slovis said the shots are given as a medical treatment, not a police function, even though ultimately they aid in an arrest.

Copyright 2008 by WSMV.com. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Got a story idea? E-mail newstips to news@wsmv.com or call the newsroom 24/7 at 615-353-2231.

Daphne
07-16-2008, 09:27 PM
It doesnt really bother me much...except for the part where giving it to the woman who could loose their babies if they are pregnant

Germanchick
07-16-2008, 09:30 PM
It bothers me quiet a bit. How are the officers to know if someone is allergic to whatever is part of that drug? Or if a woman is in the early stages of pregnancy?

rachelelizabeth
07-16-2008, 09:34 PM
Hm. It beats shooting them.
I think it should have more regulations... if they can hold the person down and inject them, why can't they handcuff them and stick them in a police car too?

LittleMsSunshine
07-16-2008, 09:34 PM
It bothers me quiet a bit. How are the officers to know if someone is allergic to whatever is part of that drug? Or if a woman is in the early stages of pregnancy?

Exactly!

Not to mention... it subdues people to the point where they might not even remember what happened. I don't think that's very fair, if their case is gonna end up going to trial.

It just seems so.... unethical to me.

goldilockz
07-16-2008, 09:35 PM
Don't want to get stuck with a needle?

DON'T RESIST ARREST

Daphne
07-16-2008, 09:42 PM
Don't want to get stuck with a needle?

DON'T RESIST ARREST

Exactley!!!

I have been in this world 30 years not once have I even been arrested or even had the cops called on me....and I am no angel by no means.

Ever watched cops....those people are just stupid!!!!

even if you do get yourself in trouble if you just do what your told there would be no reason to have to worry about it, so I find it hard to even care if people who are that disorderly get drugged. JMO

Green~Mammy
07-16-2008, 09:43 PM
Well when you are mentally ill you are not exactly able to think that logically. (or otherwise impaired I guess.) I think it is unethical especially if you don't remember what happened while you are on it. If they can get you down on the ground then they can cuff you.

Miss B Hav'n
07-16-2008, 09:44 PM
Well when you are mentally ill you are not exactly able to think that logically. (or otherwise impaired I guess.) I think it is unethical especially if you don't remember what happened while you are on it. If they can get you down on the ground then they can cuff you.

:yes

I am actually surprised that law enforcement doesn't have more of an issue with the use of the drug as I would think the amnesia effect would open a HUGE loophole for defense attornies if/when a case where it was used goes to court.

Daphne
07-16-2008, 09:50 PM
Well when you are mentally ill you are not exactly able to think that logically. (or otherwise impaired I guess.) I think it is unethical especially if you don't remember what happened while you are on it. If they can get you down on the ground then they can cuff you.

isnt that how mental institutes calm their out of control patients down? I am not shure but I was thinking this is what they did. restain them and inject them to put them out for a while.

Miss B Hav'n
07-16-2008, 09:55 PM
isnt that how mental institutes calm their out of control patients down? I am not shure but I was thinking this is what they did. restain them and inject them to put them out for a while.

Yes, but in a mental institute they are aware of the patients medical history.

Devinn
07-16-2008, 09:55 PM
Exactly!

Not to mention... it subdues people to the point where they might not even remember what happened. I don't think that's very fair, if their case is gonna end up going to trial.

It just seems so.... unethical to me.

The "amnesia" effect stated in the article is being a little blown out of proportion. For the MOST part...Versed doesn't remove ALL memory...it just.....dulls it a little. Some people however are sensitive to it and may very well not remember anything. It's an effective sedative. I don't find it at all unethical. Should definitely be more stipulations and regulations on it's use though

Don't want to get stuck with a needle?

DON'T RESIST ARREST

:yes

Berkley
07-16-2008, 09:58 PM
Don't want to get stuck with a needle?

DON'T RESIST ARREST

Yep
The "amnesia" effect stated in the article is being a little blown out of proportion. For the MOST part...Versed doesn't remove ALL memory...it just.....dulls it a little. Some people however are sensitive to it and may very well not remember anything. It's an effective sedative. I don't find it at all unethical. Should definitely be more stipulations and regulations on it's use though



:yes

and Yep

Bryanna
07-16-2008, 10:00 PM
The red flag for me is raised when the guy says that he woke up and they had him sign something... and then he was out again.

To have him sign something when he is clearly incapable of knowing what he is signing or to think that maybe he shouldn't right now is VERY wrong.

Devinn
07-16-2008, 10:03 PM
The red flag for me is raised when the guy says that he woke up and they had him sign something... and then he was out again.

To have him sign something when he is clearly incapable of knowing what he is signing or to think that maybe he shouldn't right now is VERY wrong.

I tend to think that was said for more of the "sound byte" effect. Versed wears off in about ohh....1-2 hours...or less.

OneSailorsGirl25
07-16-2008, 10:19 PM
I agree with you. I too have a problem with it. Even though these people are criminals, and many of them are violent, they are still humans. I think that it is unethical to drug inmates. There has got to be another way to subdue violence in prisons that doesn't involve drugs. I don't have much to say about other than that.

Green~Mammy
07-16-2008, 10:22 PM
isnt that how mental institutes calm their out of control patients down? I am not shure but I was thinking this is what they did. restain them and inject them to put them out for a while.

Big differance one being a hospital with DRs, and they know your medical history. The other being they have no idea what you are or are not allergic too. Get them down, cuff them, take them to mental institution for intake.

leiawen
07-16-2008, 10:43 PM
The biggest problem I see is the sheer liability risk for the police department--as others have said, injecting someone with no knowledge of their medical history does not seem like a practice that ought to be encouraged.

However, I can also see its usefulness in extreme situations where it is absolutely necessary to subdue someone because they are posing a threat to themselves or others.

Navgirl
07-16-2008, 11:34 PM
Well, I don't agre with it 100% but I think it should be an option in the most extreme cases. Sometimes people can be totally out of control and just because they are able to be held down doesn't mean they can stay down. It sounded like that one guy was still fighting and if one cop lost control of an arm or leg he probably could have gotten loose because sweat makes skin slippery.

aubrey
07-16-2008, 11:46 PM
It bothers me quiet a bit. How are the officers to know if someone is allergic to whatever is part of that drug? Or if a woman is in the early stages of pregnancy?

Well when you are mentally ill you are not exactly able to think that logically. (or otherwise impaired I guess.) I think it is unethical especially if you don't remember what happened while you are on it. If they can get you down on the ground then they can cuff you.

Big differance one being a hospital with DRs, and they know your medical history. The other being they have no idea what you are or are not allergic too. Get them down, cuff them, take them to mental institution for intake.

:agree Definitely unethical. It bothers me that they're using a drug like this on people where they don't know the person's medical history, allergies, if they're pregnant, etc.

DutchGirl
07-17-2008, 01:42 AM
I don't know... I think it is ok to use but it definitely needs to be evaluated by medical professionals, not just the police. But to me, that is what it sounds like they are doing. The police recognize the situations, and EMTs administer. I hope there would be sort of a check-and-balance situation in there. We don't know the details based on that article though.

Handcuffing someone will restrain them, but it doesn't stop excited delirium. People in a state of delirium have a strong possibility of hurting themselves or others. Letting it continue is not always good for them, either.

I think it is ethical, only used in extreme cases, and requested by both police and a medical professional.

RunAwayLove
07-17-2008, 01:46 AM
Don't want to get stuck with a needle?

DON'T RESIST ARREST


A to the freaking Men

if my dads life is saved and someone doesnt remember half an hour of their life im sorry but my dads life is WAY more important to me then that. yes i can see if you are allergice or pregnant or whatever but what the heck are you doing A. committing a crime and B resisting arrest...sorry im with the police on this one (and thats why ill never serve jury duty lmao yay for Daddy being a cop:P)

palemoon21
07-17-2008, 01:47 AM
I don't agree with this at all. What next??? The system may not like somene's sad face and think it's a hazard to their health so they give em shots of happy pills??
This is not right. It's just not right. It would never be in their medical record and if they DID have a reaction, what would happen then?

browneyedbeauty
07-17-2008, 01:48 AM
Hell no this is not ethical. There's a reason doctors are doctors and cops are cops. There's also a reason Versed is a controlled substance. Geez....

in.faith
07-17-2008, 02:22 AM
wtf? i mean i am not exactly pro-criminal, but that is like shooting wild animals with tranqs. you'd think there'd be a different standard for human beings...

:idea

or that they'd just put something in the food to keep everyone sedate and happy all the time. it'd be all paddy cakes and hair braiding up in that piece.