View Full Version : Congressman calls for cutting off Iraq war funds..


Sarah
11-15-2006, 04:27 PM
I don't know how the rest of you feel about this, but I want to smack this asswipe! Like every other American, I want this war to be over with, but this isn't the approach we need to take...

Kucinich Calls for Cutting Off Iraq War Funds
"That’s the only way we’re going to end this war."

Nov 15, 2006

Congressman Kucinich called Wednesday for cutting off funding of the Iraq war, as the surest way out of Iraq. His statements were made in an interview by Democracy Now!'s Amy Goodman.

"I want to say that there's one solution here, and it's not to engage in a debate with the President, who has taken us down a path of disaster in Iraq, but it's for Congress to assume the full power that it has under the Constitution to cut off funds. We don't need to keep indulging in this debate about what to do, because as long as we keep temporizing, the situation gets worse in Iraq.

"We have to determine that the time has come to cut off funds. There’s enough money in the pipeline to achieve the orderly withdrawal that Senator McGovern is talking about. But cut off funds, we must. That's the ultimate power of the Congress, the power of the purse. That's how we'll end this war, and that’s the only way we’re going to end this war.

"We need to shift our direction."

"We have to take a whole new approach. We’re spending over $400 billion a year, money that's also needed for healthcare, for education, for job creation, for seniors. We have to take a new look at this. We need to be a strong country, but strength isn't only military. Strength is also the economic strength of the people, their chance to have good neighborhoods. We spend more money than all the countries of the world put together for the military.

"It's time for us to start to shift our vision about who we are as a nation, because if we don't do that -- we’re borrowing money right now to wage the war in Iraq. We’re borrowing money from China. We’re not looking at our trade deficit. We’re not looking at conditions, where people are going bankrupt trying to pay their hospital bills. We need to shift our direction, and the direction has to be away from the continued militarization of the United States society."

Mao
11-15-2006, 04:29 PM
Does he mean withdraw money from Iraq by withdrawing the troops from that area?

Becca
11-15-2006, 04:29 PM
He's more interested in ending the war than winning it. That's truly sad, and truly extreme. He won't get backing.

Mao
11-15-2006, 04:36 PM
Maybe I need to read up on the situation a little more... I thought they were there primarily to bring down Saddam's regime. I understand that there's still rebuilding to be done but we do have to pull out at some point. :dunno

I agree with this: "We have to determine that the time has come to cut off funds. There’s enough money in the pipeline to achieve the orderly withdrawal that Senator McGovern is talking about. But cut off funds, we must. That's the ultimate power of the Congress, the power of the purse. That's how we'll end this war, and that’s the only way we’re going to end this war.

Caimbrie
11-15-2006, 04:55 PM
He's more interested in ending the war than winning it. That's truly sad, and truly extreme. He won't get backing.


:yes


If they pull out right now everything that has been done will fall apart and all the men and woman who have died will have died in vain.

Donna
11-15-2006, 04:57 PM
to me... if they cut funding with troops still there..... they would be putting those troops in more danger. funding means supplies, ammo and other things. maybe i am wrong.... but that is what it seems to me.

Sarah
11-15-2006, 04:57 PM
See, now him wanting to cut off the financial funds completely is the wrong way to do this. What message is this sending to the enemies. This is showing that he doesn't care if the US doesn't win the war, but to just stop the war, almost like a cease fire. If he does this, and if it goes through I truly believe the US will suffer more, and open us up for attacks. Plus, we don't want our men and women to have died in vain.

We need to do this the safe and correct way. The Iraqi government has made it clear that they don't want us to leave yet, but they need to learn to stand on their own two feet.

Seriously, if funds are stopped I think all hell will break loose. Even more than it has now.

Sarah
11-15-2006, 04:58 PM
to me... if they cut funding with troops still there..... they would be putting those troops in more danger. funding means supplies, ammo and other things. maybe i am wrong.... but that is what it seems to me.

EXACTLY!

iLuvKev
11-15-2006, 05:06 PM
to me... if they cut funding with troops still there..... they would be putting those troops in more danger. funding means supplies, ammo and other things. maybe i am wrong.... but that is what it seems to me.

:agree that is putting our troops in more harms way. w/out supplies and funding for those supplies our troops are much weaker and volnurable. i don't agree this is the way out.

Caimbrie
11-15-2006, 05:08 PM
to me... if they cut funding with troops still there..... they would be putting those troops in more danger. funding means supplies, ammo and other things. maybe i am wrong.... but that is what it seems to me.


:yes

Becca
11-15-2006, 06:26 PM
See, now him wanting to cut off the financial funds completely is the wrong way to do this. What message is this sending to the enemies.


What message is it sending to the enemies?? What message is he sending to the TROOPS???

Like I said, he'll never get backing.

Breezy
11-15-2006, 06:36 PM
Donna you and Sarah said it best

Breezy
11-15-2006, 06:37 PM
What message is it sending to the enemies?? What message is he sending to the TROOPS???

Like I said, he'll never get backing.

Very well said Becca
Why don't he cut his damn paycheck a little?:banghead :vent