View Full Version : Gov. of TX requires schoolgirls to get cancer vax


harrisonsdream
02-02-2007, 07:21 PM
Perry orders anti-cancer vaccine for schoolgirls


By LIZ AUSTIN PETERSON
Associated Press

TOOLS
Email Get section feed
Print Subscribe NOW

RESOURCES
related links
School Zone: Got a spare $360?
Vaccine's price, insurance problems limit patient access
Gardasil AT A GLANCE
HOW IT WORKS: Gardasil blocks infection by four common strains of human papilloma virus or HPV, which can cause cervical cancer many years after infection. HPV, which eventually infects over half of all sexually active people, also causes genital warts.

CANCER CASES: On average, there are 9,710 new cases of cervical cancer and 3,700 deaths in the U.S. each year. Worldwide, cervical cancer is the No. 2 cancer in women, causing over 470,000 new cases and 233,000 deaths a year.

WHO SHOULD GET IT: Medical groups recommend routine vaccination for girls ages 11 and 12, and say it can be given to girls as young as 9 and up to 18. It is approved for women up to age 26.

ADMINISTRATION: Three doses, given over six months.

COST: $360 price for the three doses required

INSURANCE: Merck, which says Gardasil is covered by 96 percent of insurance plans, recently added Gardasil and its other adult vaccines to its patient assistance program.

EFFECTIVENESS: Manufacturer Merck & Co. says Gardasil prevents 99 percent of infections by two HPV strains that cause about 70 percent of cervical cancer and two strains that cause most genital warts.

SALES SO FAR: $235 million, mostly in the United States.

WHAT'S NEXT: Merck is completing testing of Gardasil on women ages 26 to 45 and will apply for approval for those groups by year's end; it is testing it in young males and could seek approval in 2008.

COMPETITION: Rival drug maker GlaxoSmithKline is developing its own vaccine, Cervarix, and could seek approval this year.

———

Sources: Merck & Co., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Cancer Institute.





AUSTIN — Gov. Rick Perry signed an order today making Texas the first state to require that schoolgirls be vaccinated against the sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer.

By issuing an executive order, Perry apparently sidesteps opposition in the Legislature from conservatives and parents' rights groups who fear such a requirement would condone premarital sex and interfere with the way parents raise their children.

Beginning in September 2008, girls entering the sixth grade will have to get Gardasil, Merck & Co.'s new vaccine against strains of the human papillomavirus, or HPV.

Perry, a conservative Christian who opposes abortion and stem-cell research using embryonic cells, counts on the religious right for his political base. But he has said the cervical cancer vaccine is no different from the one that protects children against polio.

"The HPV vaccine provides with with an incredible opportunity to effectively target and prevent cervical cancer," Perry said in announcing the order.

Merck is bankrolling efforts to pass state laws across the country mandating Gardasil for girls as young as 11 or 12. It doubled its lobbying budget in Texas and has funneled money through Women in Government, an advocacy group made up of female state legislators around the country.

Perry has several ties to Merck and Women in Government. One of the drug company's three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, Perry's former chief of staff. His current chief of staff's mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for Women in Government.

Perry also received $6,000 from Merck's political action committee during his re-election campaign.

Parents can have their daughters opt out of the inoculations by filing an objection on religious or other philosophical grounds. Even with such provisions, however, conservative groups say such requirements interfere with parents' rights to make medical decisions for their children.

The federal government approved Gardasil in June, and a government advisory panel has recommended that all girls get the shots at 11 and 12, before they are likely to be sexually active.

The vaccine is too new to know how long protection will last, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Studies have followed women for five years and found that they are still protected. More research is being done to find out how long protection will last, and if a booster vaccine is needed years later.

That uncertainty adds to conservatives' oppositon.

The New Jersey-based drug company could generate billions in sales if Gardasil — at $360 for the three-shot regimen — were made mandatory across the country. Most insurance companies now cover the vaccine, which has been shown to have no serious side effects.

Merck spokeswoman Janet Skidmore would not say how much the company is spending on lobbyists or how much it has donated to Women in Government. Susan Crosby, the group's president, also declined to specify how much the drug company gave.

A top official from Merck's vaccine division sits on Women in Government's business council, and many of the bills around the country have been introduced by members of Women in Government
_________________________________________________________________
i think this is a good idea being as tx has a high rate of unplanned teen pregnancy which in turn suggests that there is a high rate of unprotected sex which in turn leads to the risk of higher risk of STD's. i know when i have a daughter she sure as sh!t is getting it.

USCGBoxerMom
02-02-2007, 07:26 PM
I think it's a great idea! I will have to check with the base and see if they have the vaccine for my DD. It's great we have come so far medically that we can actually help PREVENT a type of cancer!

VinnysGirl
02-02-2007, 07:40 PM
Merck is bankrolling efforts to pass state laws across the country mandating Gardasil for girls as young as 11 or 12. It doubled its lobbying budget in Texas and has funneled money through Women in Government, an advocacy group made up of female state legislators around the country.



I like the idea of the vaccine, but I'm not very thrilled with the way politicians are counting on the money from the drug companies so that they can increase sales.... That really chaps me the wrong way! Nothing like a bunch of porkbarreling going on in politics! Gotta LOVE financial pressure. :rolleyes

I do think the vaccine is a great advancement, but honestly where are parents going to come up with 360 bucks for a shot. The 120 for the meningitis shot was bad enough, and insurance companies would only pay for it in certain situations, when in reality we all know that kids 13-24 need to have it anyway!

Debra
02-02-2007, 07:45 PM
I like the idea of the vaccine, but I'm not very thrilled with the way politicians are counting on the money from the drug companies so that they can increase sales.... That really chaps me the wrong way! Nothing like a bunch of porkbarreling going on in politics! Gotta LOVE financial pressure. :rolleyes

I do think the vaccine is a great advancement, but honestly where are parents going to come up with 360 bucks for a shot. The 120 for the meningitis shot was bad enough, and insurance companies would only pay for it in certain situations, when in reality we all know that kids 13-24 need to have it anyway!

I'm with you there! And I absolutely refuse to give my daughter this shot until it's been around for awhile & I can research more about it! I don't like the idea of anyone jumping at a shot that hasn't been around long enough to see what any side effects, etc are. I'm so picky about delaying & being selective about shots anyway so I am sure most aren't surprised by my views on this one as well!

Rick Perry can kiss my hiney! :teehee

VinnysGirl
02-02-2007, 07:50 PM
I'm with you there! And I absolutely refuse to give my daughter this shot until it's been around for awhile & I can research more about it! I don't like the idea of anyone jumping at a shot that hasn't been around long enough to see what any side effects, etc are. I'm so picky about delaying & being selective about shots anyway so I am sure most aren't surprised by my views on this one as well!

Rick Perry can kiss my hiney! :teehee


I've never much liked him and his Robin Hood legislation in my completely honest opinion is one of the worst in legislative history... lets punish the school districts with more kids (higher pop, which means more tax dollars) to buy IMACs for the lower pop schools. RIIIIIIGHT!

Debra
02-02-2007, 07:53 PM
I've never much liked him and his Robin Hood legislation in my completely honest opinion is one of the worst in legislative history... lets punish the school districts with more kids (higher pop, which means more tax dollars) to buy IMACs for the lower pop schools. RIIIIIIGHT!

I think you & I are on the same wavelength! Great minds think alike! :wink

VinnysGirl
02-02-2007, 07:56 PM
Yeah, well things are bigger and better in Texas, but certainly not him! LOL!! :giggle

I think the Grandma would've gotten in there and straightened things out! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! We'll see how things go in the next election... sucks he's got another 4 years to screw up the education system some more.. and it was really starting to work well before he got into office! :no

VinnysGirl
02-02-2007, 07:57 PM
SORRY FOR THREADJACKING!!!! :D

Ellen
02-02-2007, 07:59 PM
I don't think it should be required.

leftover
02-02-2007, 08:02 PM
Perry has several ties to Merck and Women in Government. One of the drug company's three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, Perry's former chief of staff. His current chief of staff's mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for Women in Government.

Perry also received $6,000 from Merck's political action committee during his re-election campaign.


That really pisses me off.... It kinda makes his motives a little clearer..

harrisonsdream
02-02-2007, 08:54 PM
i think the general idea of the vaccine is a good idea but the way they are going about it is not the best.

Mindy
02-03-2007, 12:25 PM
I don't think it should be required. Is Rick Perry going to personally fund this law if some parents can't afford it? What about if their insurance won't cover it? Are they just screwed?

Ashnbri
02-03-2007, 02:30 PM
I dont think it should be required either..but my mom is getting my sister to get it as soon as possible...I have moderate cervical cancer and if I could get the shot I would..but since it doesn't get rid of it there is no point. I think it is a personal decision and should defi. be thought of if you are having sex even if it it with the same person.

harrisonsdream
02-03-2007, 05:27 PM
I dont think it should be required either..but my mom is getting my sister to get it as soon as possible...I have moderate cervical cancer and if I could get the shot I would..but since it doesn't get rid of it there is no point. I think it is a personal decision and should defi. be thought of if you are having sex even if it it with the same person.

my drs. think i have a strain that causes cervical cancer due to the repeated abnormal paps i get and i would've gotten the vax if i could've but its too late now