So I don't know how many people have small children who watch Harry Potter.. but what do you think about him at 17 years old doing nude sex scenes in a play?

I know he's an actor but how in the world, if those pictures surface and SOMEHOW a small child finds out, would a parent explain that?

edited because I really don't feel like "arguing" today and really haven't have even posted.

That he is an adult and can do that if he wants? AND..I would not allow my children to see him naked either. If this is how he feels he needs to break out of his Harry Potter stigma then so be it.

edited because I really don't feel like "arguing" today and really haven't have even posted.

i wish you hadnt changed it.... i completely agree. so I will summarized what you said. He is an actor, not Harry Potter. no biggie;)

My younger brother and step brother and sister LOVE Harry Potter and I have no problem (neither does my mom) with Daniel Radcliffe's (sp?) recent acting move. Yea he is looked upon as a famous character but people grow and IMO I think parents need to be the ones responsible for informing there kids about the difference between Harry Potter and an actor who is exploring a new career move (does that make sense?) JMO

Yeah I agree with that too.

I just think maybe he should do it after all the HP movies are released.


Not quite sure why she felt someone would argue.

Yeah I agree with that too.

I just think maybe he should do it after all the HP movies are released.


Not quite sure why she felt someone would argue.

why should he wait. his part with the movies are done, isnt he? i dont know, i am not into harry potter and niether are my kids.

he's got 3 more movies to go.

but that's his business he can do what he wants.

Guess I'm just old-fashioned..

I don't think he should wait. 3 movies is a LONG time for him to put his career on hold as NOT being Harry Potter.

Yeah I agree with that too.

I just think maybe he should do it after all the HP movies are released.


Not quite sure why she felt someone would argue.

Because I'm in a defensive mood tonight :shrug

Sorry.

i wish you hadnt changed it.... i completely agree. so I will summarized what you said. He is an actor, not Harry Potter. no biggie;)

:lol Thanks for the summarization. To me (a freaking Harry Potter fanatic since day one), Harry Potter is a fictional book character, not at all an actor in Hollywood's portrayal of him in a movie. If I had children, I would explain that to them.

Well i was shocked but they do grow up and do different things. He can't be little Harry Potter forever.