View Full Version : Oregon Governor To Live On Food Stamps


Jennygirl
04-23-2007, 11:19 AM
(CBS News) SALEM, Oregon Oregon Democratic Gov. Ted Kulongoski and his wife, attorney Mary Oberst, have enough money to get by and meals are generally no problem.

But things will be different this week.

This is Hunger Awareness Week in Oregon, and for the next seven days, Kulongoski and Oberst will be cutting way back – down to the budget one would live on if relying on food stamps – a diet they hope others will also follow for a few days to better understand the plight of those who have no choice.

They'll spend just $3 a day apiece on their meals, $42 in all, to match the amount spent by the average food stamp recipient in Oregon.

"I'm gonna probably go back to what I remember in college, Top Ramen and hot dogs," said Kulongoski.

It won't be easy, but the less than bountiful fare is for a cause, reports CBS News correspondent Stephan Kaufman, as Kulongoski begins lobbying Congress against cuts in the food stamp program proposed by the Bush administration.

"The problem is we've just been reducing the money and the eligibility rolls of those who can get food stamps," said Kulongoski, who lived in a home for boys as a child and worked his way up, with a boost from the GI bill. "At the same time, those on food stamps are getting less."

The Oregon governor is also a strong advocate of school breakfast and lunch programs. "When the federal government cuts back on them," says Kulongoski, "you're actually depriving children of opportunity to basically have a healthy life and at the same time, to be able to learn while they're in school."

The Bush administration has proposed several cuts to the program, among them taking away food stamps from about 185,000 people who qualify only because they receive other non-cash government assistance. The Department of Agriculture budget, as proposed, would also eliminate a program that gives boxes of food to nearly half a million seniors each month.

The administration has proposed some changes hailed by hunger advocates, like excluding retirement savings from income limits, and setting aside money to encourage food stamp recipients to purchase more fresh produce.

Oregon's first couple are the most-high profile people so far to take part in a "food stamp challenge," a growing trend sponsored by religious groups, community activists and food pantries across the country. The goal is to walk the proverbial mile in the steps of those who rely on food stamps to feed a family, to kindle both awareness, and, hopefully, empathy.

"It really re-energized me to be so much more conscious of what people are going through," said Sister Mary Scullion, the executive director of a Philadelphia nonprofit that works with the homeless, who did the food-stamp challenge last year. "It's about understanding the limited choices people have, and how money gives you choices."

Those who've done the challenge say it can leave you both physically enervated and mentally exhilarated. They say shopping on such a tight budget requires plenty of planning, a reliance on inexpensive staples like legumes, beans, rice and peanut butter, and forgoing more expensive fresh fruit, vegetables and protein.

Meeting friends for a slice of pizza or a cup of coffee becomes a nearly unaffordable luxury. Cheating by using staples already on hand, like ketchup or olive oil, is discouraged.

"On the spiritual side, when I did eat, I was more present," said Connecticut state Sen. Jonathan Harris, D-West Hartford, who just finished three weeks on food stamp funds. "Usually I'm watching TV, shoveling things in, not thinking that I am blessed."

Like Kulongoski, Harris said, he's lucky to have a car to get to a grocery store and a kitchen in which to prepare food. And like Kulongoski will have to do, he had to resist the free goodies at state receptions and business lunches.

The experience has helped him as a policymaker, Harris said, in discussions such as whether to expand the earned-income tax credit in Connecticut.

"I personally felt how a few extra hundred dollars in the bank to supplement my nutrition would make a major difference in my life," he said.

Hunger has been a major issue in Oregon, ever since the state was embarrassed by having the country's highest hunger rate in 2000. Hunger groups launched an effort to get more people signed up for food stamps, and the state's ranking fell to 17th.

Kulongoski, too, has made it a priority, regularly serving at soup kitchens and helping to unload donations at the state's food pantries.

Karen Wilson, director of the Greater Philadelphia Coalition against Hunger, said Kulongoski's support of the food stamp challenge is particularly notable, given the time of year.

"People only seem to focus on hunger and food insecurity around the holidays," she said. "People are hungry year-round."

harrisonsdream
04-23-2007, 11:21 AM
good for them!

JoyS
04-23-2007, 11:53 AM
wow, good for them!

Kara
04-23-2007, 11:56 AM
That's a great idea.

I_Love_my_marine
04-23-2007, 12:56 PM
I wish more people would consider doing this, once they become rich sometimes they forget where they could be!

bunkie
04-23-2007, 02:26 PM
I wish more people would consider doing this, once they become rich sometimes they forget where they could be!

I agree. :yes

Amber V
04-23-2007, 03:44 PM
This is great. I am glad to hear that someone high up is trying to make a difference.

mara_jade81
04-23-2007, 06:22 PM
That's great of them but I dislike Kulongoski in general.

Green~Mammy
04-23-2007, 06:27 PM
I think it is great that he is doing it but really it is not a huge sacrifice at the end of seven days he gets to go back to the life style he is accustomed to. The working poor don't get that option at all. his time would be better spent finding out ways they can help the working poor to get in a better position.

leftover
04-23-2007, 06:37 PM
7 days???

FrothySilvette
04-23-2007, 07:16 PM
Maybe it's different state-to-state -but when I was on foodstamps (a long time ag .. me and two boys) they actually gave us too much money - I had a surplus each month even after shopping quite 'high end' - shrimp and such.

Green~Mammy
04-23-2007, 07:58 PM
Maybe it's different state-to-state -but when I was on foodstamps (a long time ag .. me and two boys) they actually gave us too much money - I had a surplus each month even after shopping quite 'high end' - shrimp and such.
I would say you are the exception not the rule, when we were on we had barely enough and had to drink fake orange juice...Tampico anyone. (I love the way it tastes but it is completely not good for you in fact it contains NO juice)

FrothySilvette
04-23-2007, 08:02 PM
Well - our overall diet back then was alraedy different - so there was no 'switch' to foodstamps.
Like - we ate a lot of pasta and rice, things like that - those were the staples of our diet - the cheap stuff that a lot of people 'step down' to.

Even when I had 3 kids I was somehow able to feed a family of 5 on $70.00 a week by using coupons and such.

Green~Mammy
04-23-2007, 08:14 PM
Well - our overall diet back then was alraedy different - so there was no 'switch' to foodstamps.
Like - we ate a lot of pasta and rice, things like that - those were the staples of our diet - the cheap stuff that a lot of people 'step down' to.

Even when I had 3 kids I was somehow able to feed a family of 5 on $70.00 a week by using coupons and such.

Thats pretty much how I am with my family now. We eat a lot of rice, pasta, and other grains, beans all different sorts, fresh veggies & fruit. We eat very little meat I stick to mostly Lamb, Fish, Turkey, Chicken, & even less Beef. We are Jewish so no pork and no shell fish. I also do at least four vegetarian suppers a week because it is not only better for our bodies BUT better for the environment too. Most of our breakfasts, and dinners are already meat free. So I don't really count them as veg because it is not something I try and plan where supper is planned out the Saturday before for the whole week.