View Full Version : Female Airman Punished for Threesome


Green~Mammy
05-25-2007, 10:42 PM
Female Airman Punished for Threesome
Stars and Stripes | By Scott Schonauer | May 24, 2007

SPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE, Germany — A Spangdahlem-based airman was sentenced Monday to four months confinement for her part in a sexual act with two other airmen.

Airman 1st Class Ashley N. Rains pleaded guilty at a court-martial to two indecent acts charges.

She had faced rape and sodomy charges but admitted to the lesser charges as part of a plea deal.

Judge (Col.) Gordon Hammock also sentenced Rains, 22, an aircrew life support specialist with the 22nd Fighter Squadron, to reduction to the lowest pay grade.

She faced a maximum sentence that included as many as 10 years in a military prison, but Air Force prosecutors argued for a lighter sentence of two years.

The alcohol-induced menage a trois on Sept. 24 in Bitburg included a male airman and a female staff sergeant.

But both prosecution and defense lawyers debated whether it was consensual among the three.

Rains and Airman Christopher D. Hicks are the only airmen charged in the incident because the Air Force lawyers said the staff sergeant was too drunk to give consent.

Air Force prosecutor Capt. Mike Felsen said the staff sergeant “appeared drunk” and slipped “in and out of consciousness” while Rains and Hicks performed sexual acts with her.

Felsen argued the staff sergeant, who did not testify during the trial, was vulnerable and Rains and Hicks took advantage of her.

But Rains’ defense attorney, Capt. Matthew King, called the incident a situation involving three consenting adults with “various degrees of intoxication.”

King argued that Rains shouldn’t go to jail for what amounts to a drunken threesome.

“Does she really have to go to jail for this?” he asked.

The Air Force had charged Rains with rape and sodomy, but prosecutors could not prove the more serious charges, King added, therefore, the question of consent isn’t relevant in Rains’ case.

Rains said she was embarrassed by the episode.

“I’ve learned from this mistake,” she said during a statement she read at the trial.

Hicks faces more serious charges.

The airman, who is assigned to the 52nd Civil Engineer Squadron, has been charged with rape and sodomy and will face a court-martial at Spangdahlem Air Base on May 30.

http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,136750,00.html?ESRC=dod.nl

mary79
05-25-2007, 10:47 PM
Wow,thats crazy!!!

harrisonsdream
05-25-2007, 10:48 PM
at first i had to laugh at the stupidity of the people but then i'm just like wow that sucks

Cherrish
05-25-2007, 10:50 PM
What a bunch of drunken idiots....I wonder who snitched?

Green~Mammy
05-25-2007, 10:56 PM
I don't know it makes me mad that they did so much to help this one woman but between myself and so many other service members even with proof they brush it under the table. If they did take advantage of this woman they do deserve punishment and it is really hard to get a rape case TO court martial so I would say there must be some pretty solid proof.

amandalaine
05-25-2007, 11:00 PM
This is where I got my question of is it rape or not last night. They were probably all drunk.

MIKOSWIFEY
05-25-2007, 11:04 PM
Well the 2nd girl was lapsing in and out of consciousness, so I think that counts as rape. Even if she consented technically she wasn't conscious through most of it. All of them were idiots, though. How gross.

Green~Mammy
05-25-2007, 11:05 PM
This is where I got my question of is it rape or not last night. They were probably all drunk.

Then I would have to say yes in all likely hood it was rape. The woman said she was in and out of consciousness and unable to say no. That would be rape. She was unable to give her consent. Her being drunk is not even a factor if as she is saying was so drunk she could not function. That is not a case of giving consent and then regretting it afterward this is a case of no consent had been given at all.