View Full Version : Toddler's dance destroys monks' intricate sand painting


Britt
05-28-2007, 11:41 PM
Toddler's dance destroys monks' intricate sand painting
By MATT CAMPBELL
The Kansas City Star

A toddler danced through an intricate sand design built over two days at Union Station by monks.
Security camera shows toddler dancing on monks' mandala at Union Station VIDEO
Talk about a test of faith.

Eight Tibetan monks spent two days cross-legged on the floor at Union Station, leaning over to meticulously create an intricate design of colored sand as an expression of their Buddhist faith. They were more than halfway done.

And then, within seconds, their work was destroyed by a toddler.

Monks are bald, so they couldn’t rip their hair out. But were they angry? Did they curse?

No. They simply smiled and started over.

“No problem,” said Geshe Lobsang Sumdup, leader of the group from the Drepung Gomang Monastery in southern India.

“We didn’t get despondent,” he said Wednesday through a translator. “We have three days more. So we will have to work harder.”

That the monks were able to shrug off their setback can be attributed to their religion.

“It teaches us that nothing is permanent,” said Staci Olsen, a volunteer at the Rime Buddhist Center in Kansas City.

Sometime Tuesday after the monks had finished their labors for the day a woman with her small child visited the post office inside Union Station, near where the design was being created. The child, apparently attracted by the pretty colors, wandered over to play with it.

“He did a little tap dance on it, completely destroying it,” said Lama Chuck Stanford of the Rime center.

The mother did not report the incident, but a security camera at Union Station captured the moment.

“She summarily picked the child up and boogied,” said Bob Smock, security manager for the station.

The sand design was surrounded by stanchions, but the child simply went under the tape. Officials have said they now will place benches around the new creation to further protect it.

The design is called a mandala, and there are thousands of different patterns. The one these monks are working on represents Chenrezig, the bodhisattva of compassion.

Traditionally, monks create a mandala to mark the new year.

To start, they put brightly colored sand into a metal funnel called a chakbu and rub it gently to distribute the sand. When they have finished the mandala they sweep up the sand and deposit it into a river.

These monks are on a yearlong tour of the United States and Canada to raise money for their monastery; the original in Tibet was destroyed by the Chinese. This is not the first time monks from the monastery have visited Kansas City and Union Station. On this trip, they will continue to work on the mandala today and Friday.

During a closing ceremony at 2 p.m. Saturday they will sweep up the sand and offer bits to onlookers to place in their gardens. The rest of the sand will be placed in the Missouri River.

“The belief is that it will carry the blessings all over the planet, from the Missouri River to the Mississippi to the gulf and to all the oceans of the world,” Stanford said.

Jampa Tenzin, one of the monks who can speak a little English, said this was the first time on this tour a mandala in progress had been destroyed. But the monks know the child was innocent.

“They have meditated so long they have developed this equanimity,” Stanford said. “Regardless of what happens — if a kid dances on your sand mandala — it’s OK. If everybody in the world had that kind of stability of mind we’d be better off.”


You can see the video here: http://www.kansascity.com/105/story/120315.html

I really don't know what I would've done if I was that boy's mother. I don't think it would've been pretty. :reallymad

Green~Mammy
05-28-2007, 11:44 PM
I would of told someone what had happened, unlike her she just left. It was not the toddler's fault that she did not maintain control of him. It was completely aviodable and completely her fault.

leftover
05-28-2007, 11:45 PM
I dunno what's stranger.. That the monks left 2 days of work unattended, or that a mom left a toddler unattended for that long... :shrug

SchlegelsBaby
05-28-2007, 11:45 PM
I would have spanked him if it was my child. But of course why wasn't the mother keeping an eye on the child to keep him from going under the tape? I think the mother should have at least reported it. Frankly because she didn't I think that was rude. That's just me though.

Victoria
05-28-2007, 11:47 PM
WOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!

The boy was there for a PRETTY LONGGGGGG time too!!! Where the heck did the mom go?!?
There should've been security gards standing there or the sand painting should be surrounded by a glass enclosure.

Victoria
05-28-2007, 11:47 PM
I dunno what's stranger.. That the monks left 2 days of work unattended, or that a mom left a toddler unattended for that long... :shrug

SERIOUSLY!!!!!

leftover
05-28-2007, 11:51 PM
SERIOUSLY!!!!!

Well, yea.. Those cameras could have recorded his abduction... No way in a train station would I let my child out of my sight for a second..

HuskerFan
05-28-2007, 11:51 PM
Where was the mom while all of that was happening?! I don't let my daughter get that far away from me no matter where we are.

*Crystal*
05-28-2007, 11:52 PM
OMG the mother was obviously not paying attention because if she was, why the HELL would she let her son do that???

*Crystal*
05-28-2007, 11:52 PM
Well, yea.. Those cameras could have recorded his abduction... No way in a train station would I let my child out of my sight for a second..

ITA!!! Someone could have easily picked him up in that amount of time! I dont even let my daughter out of my site that long in my OWN HOUSE!!

Pebbles
05-28-2007, 11:58 PM
Someone ought to kick the mother in the rear. Way to go for taking responsibility :sarcasm

=Mrs.AiNokeA=
05-28-2007, 11:58 PM
OMG how awful... gotta love them though for being so wonderful about the whole thing. :lovestruck I really wish I could be more like that. :yes

Britt
05-28-2007, 11:59 PM
She was mailing a package.

I'm surprised they didn't have little barriers up too. I mean, it's Union Station. That's a pretty busy place in ANY city.

Green~Mammy
05-29-2007, 12:04 AM
I don't see this as the child's fault, the train station's fault, or the monk's fault, it is completely the Mother's fault. SHE let go of her child's hand, SHE left the child unattended, SHE did not show her child that the responsible thing to do is to tell someone that you "broke" something. I would not of spanked my child (mostly because I don't spank) BUT I would of taken responsibility for MY actions and the consequences of those actions.

There were barriers up he went right under them.

Britt
05-29-2007, 12:14 AM
When I meant barriers, I meant like those mesh-fences people use for contruction sites. Not a little rope-thing that a toddler obviously can walk under.

Victoria
05-29-2007, 12:17 AM
When I meant barriers, I meant like those mesh-fences people use for contruction sites. Not a little rope-thing that a toddler obviously can walk under.

Honestly....I do NOT think those are sufficient ways to keep one out of a restricted area. Hell...they're at the banks to make lines more organized. My son even enjoys playing with the damn things.

=Mrs.AiNokeA=
05-29-2007, 12:37 AM
Honestly....I do NOT think those are sufficient ways to keep one out of a restricted area. Hell...they're at the banks to make lines more organized. My son even enjoys playing with the damn things.


:yes Kids love to play on those things hell I know I did when I was younger. :giggle Even if you let your child out of your site for a second those suckers are fast and could still do serious damage. :lol (I don't mean suckers in a bad mean way for those who might think that... it's supposed to be funny ;))

Green~Mammy
05-29-2007, 12:38 AM
The barrier thing does not really matter to me because the blame rests squarely on the Mother's shoulders. I was under the impression that the Monks were still working on the project merely taking a break.

=Mrs.AiNokeA=
05-29-2007, 12:42 AM
The barrier thing does not really matter to me because the blame rests squarely on the Mother's shoulders. I was under the impression that the Monks were still working on the project merely taking a break.

I agree she let her child out of her site for way too long and that was wrong. Just curious though lets say she had her child with her and the child just ran right under it and ruined it and she immediately ran after her child and grabbed him/her out of there... would it make a difference? :shrug

Wicked
05-29-2007, 12:50 AM
Wow, I am totally impressed by how the monks handled it. Definitely gives me more respect for the Buddhist faith!

Green~Mammy
05-29-2007, 12:52 AM
I agree she let her child out of her site for way too long and that was wrong. Just curious though lets say she had her child with her and the child just ran right under it and ruined it and she immediately ran after her child and grabbed him/her out of there... would it make a difference? :shrug

The only way it would make a difference is if she did the right thing which is to tell someone what her child had done. I don't think she should of let go of the child's hand at all in the first place. If the child is a "runner" (as my oldest was) then he needs to be either in a harness (I used the little back pack monkey by Eddie Bauer one he loved it) or in a stroller.

If your child damages something in a store or public place it is always your fault even if it is an accident. It is not the store/places fault your child got away from you. I think she could of taught her child a valuable lesson in personal responsibility and doing the right thing even when no one is looking and she just let it slip out of her fingers. Doesn't matter if she was embarressed or what ever her excuse was.

Bex
05-29-2007, 12:52 AM
holy shit, how LONG did it freaking take the mom to get the kid... and NO reprimanding whatsoever??!?!?!?

Green~Mammy
05-29-2007, 12:53 AM
holy shit, how LONG did it freaking take the mom to get the kid... and NO reprimanding whatsoever??!?!?!?

I know if you notice when he first gets in there he stops for a moment and walks over in the direction his Mother went in. When he does not get called away he goes back to playing in the sand.

=Mrs.AiNokeA=
05-29-2007, 12:54 AM
The only way it would make a difference is if she did the right thing which is to tell someone what her child had done. I don't think she should of let go of the child's hand at all in the first place. If the child is a "runner" (as my oldest was) then he needs to be either in a harness (I used the little back pack monkey by Eddie Bauer one he loved it) or in a stroller.

If your child damages something in a store or public place it is always your fault even if it is an accident. It is not the store/places fault your child got away from you. I think she could of taught her child a valuable lesson in personal responsibility and doing the right thing even when no one is looking and she just let it slip out of her fingers. Doesn't matter if she was embarressed or what ever her excuse was.

I agree she should of atleast told someone for her to just grab her kid and walk away was just wrong. :no Accidents happen specially with kids but it's up to the parent to teach that child that what they did was wrong and to be responsible for what that child did. :yes

Green~Mammy
05-29-2007, 01:00 AM
I agree she should of atleast told someone for her to just grab her kid and walk away was just wrong. :no Accidents happen specially with kids but it's up to the parent to teach that child that what they did was wrong and to be responsible for what that child did. :yes

Exactly case in point I took my oldest to the Desert Museum a couple months ago in the gift shop he knocked a carved stone animal to the floor on accident. I picked it up explained to him that he has to be very careful in shops and paid for the broken item. The cashier was very surprised that I was buying a broken $15.00 carving. I wanted to show my son though that we have to be responsible for things we do EVEN if it is an accident.

Wicked
05-29-2007, 01:01 AM
Exactly case in point I took my oldest to the Desert Museum a couple months ago in the gift shop he knocked a carved stone animal to the floor on accident. I picked it up explained to him that he has to be very careful in shops and paid for the broken item. The cashier was very surprised that I was buying a broken $15.00 carving. I wanted to show my son though that we have to be responsible for things we do EVEN if it is an accident.

I wish more parents were like you...

JoyS
05-29-2007, 01:41 AM
Wow that is insane!